Tuesday, December 30, 2008

The final post. of 2008.

Mankind has always needed some sort of guidance. Religion serves this purpose really well, even though it's really flawed and doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. I guess that's what faith is. Blind faith? All forms of faith are about being blind. After watching and reading documentaries and stories of wisemen trying to teach people how religion is false and they should open their eyes, I've realized a few things.

1)Like Nietzsche says, sometimes you defend your point of view only because the opposition really gets on your nerves. Religious people have their faith strengthened with every argument they have with atheists, and atheists feel more strongly that religious people are blind after every argument. It's human nature to defend your point of view, even though 90% of the time it isn't YOUR point of view, just a collective point of view that seems to make more sense to you because of what you've been taught your whole life. Evolution wasn't MY way of explaining things, it was Darwin's idea, I rely on smart people to get me answers. And so does the rest of the less than smart population of the Earth.

2)The thing is, as much as I'd like to believe the human mind is the most powerful organ ever, just looking at the bell curve shows you that only a lucky few can open their minds and accept the truth. Most people will try to have the best of both worlds. You know, a lot of people try to explain religious stories, traditional values with science, without realizing it's one or the other. I know people who can sit down and explain every physics theory but still pray at the end of the day.

3)I realized that as much of a lie religion way be at times, it is a great tool. We've all seen first hand how it can be bent to change a persons mind, but let's not forget the number of people who live an actively "good" lifestyle because of their beliefs.

4)Freedom is an illusion. I've illustrated this point previously, but I think I might as well do it again. If I told you an apple was actually an orange using scientific mambo jumbo explanations(this is just a thought experiment, play along), in your mind, it would still be an apple, not because it IS an apple(for apples are called so many different names in so many different languages), but because you've been told(from a young age) that it is an apple. Same thing goes for nearly every other thing. If you were taught religious values when a child, then chances are you are going to cling to them for the rest of your life unless you've opened your mind.

So IF religion isn't as true as it claims to be, HOW would you know if your living a good life, a proper life? Simple. Here I need to explain something mathematical.

-Time is infinite
there is no beginning, no ending, no middle of time. It's not one long line, it never ages, it never slow and never speeds up. OK? So it goes on and on and on and on forever.

-Matter is finite
Matter and energy cannot be created or destroyed. Just converted

-Movement is random
That just means NOTHING is scripted. everything moves without consciously knowing why it is moving or where it is moving.

Okay? Now for the thought experiment.
If I gave a typewriter to an immortal chimp and all it could do was randomly hit keys on the typewriter for EVER, even though most of what the chimp types out will look like:

oadgaodbigabipgbo[iaogbdab gddba igasidigai

EVENTUALLY, he would have written every Harry Potter book and every other book in existence. Why? It is all about probability. Even though the probability of all those logical words coming together is very very low, given the infinite length of time and the ageless chimp, eventually, it will come together. It may take days, hours, years, or much much longer, but EVENTUALLY, it would happen.

Now, let's assume those three things I've pointed out are true
-Time is infinite
-Matter is finite
-Movement is random

Then eventually, this life, this universe, this age of man will repeat itself, right? Given a few trillion years, this might just happen again. Me, sitting here and typing. Hell maybe it has happened many times before, and this could be the 4th or 5th time this version of the universe has existed. It sounds crazy. But hey, this is a thought experiment, not an actual truth.

The very fact that you can imagine the possibility is enough for the next section of the thought experiment. So, make sure you understand the first section.

Now, imagine every action, every joy, every sadness, every aspect of your life being repeated over and over and over again and infinite number of times. Would you feel despair or joy if the choices you make now are repeated over and over again? Remember, in THIS version of the universe, I might choose to shout at precisely 1pm, but in a remake I'd choose NOT to. In another remake I'd choose to clap my hands at 1pm. The possibilities are ENDLESS. And all those possibilities are repeated over and over and over again.

So now, if you've understood what I just wrote, take some quiet time to imagine this life being repeated over and over and over again(remember, it doesn't matter if it really happens, time could be finite according to some physics people, and it doesn't matter if you would remember this life the next time it occurs, the mere fact that you can imagine it recurring over and over and over again will show you if the choices you made are right or wrong). imagine it, and ask your self, are you happy with the version of life you are living? If you suddenly feel you don't want to be in this version of your life, then it is truly time for a change.

4 comments:

The Iconoclast. said...

The monkey and typewriter thought experiment?

That was a really good one. You seriously need to consider Philosophy as a career option dude. The world can never have enough thinkers.

Probability; just like every mathematical or statistical term out there; is defined in numbers and are based on laws that have previously existed.

And in this case; the theoretical physicist does his job by attempting to solve the unsolved mysteries of the universe by putting it in mathematical equations and then observing how well the answer describes the real thing. and gets slammed by religious bodies in the process for putting everything so simply.

The Brandon Carter came along and asked all the "what ifs". He didn't question natural phenomenon, he questioned the forms of laws itself. He proposed that if the laws differed even slightly, then all existence would be be impossible and the entire universe would have gone unnoticed.

SLIGHTLY. So if we were to believe in what supposedly is common sense and solid explanation; then Our existence hangs in balance on a very, very, very fine line. The fine tuning of the laws; they call it.

The way the laws adjust so perfectly; such incredible tuning; to explain the existence of life. Or do the laws allow ourselves to exist? Or Were they there to justify our idealism of existence?

Church and Science.

There is no open-mindedness.

Our stands are equally original; our strength in the opposition.


happy new year soob. you're not legal hahahahahahhahah.

Julia C said...

Einstein was a clever man

Unknown said...

I really don't know what to say.... um, maybe i'll post something about open mindedness. I think going so far as to say there is NO OPEN MINDEDNESS is a little harsh. The very fact that I can honestly say I am a little more open minded then I was a year ago doesn't show that I am completely open minded now, but that there are degrees of open mindedness. And that should be enough proof there might be a human out there with complete open mindedness. Still, I'd like to keep an open mind by saying you might be right.

Gabs said...

It's not too much of a stretch in imagination to see how all this can go round and round...Why does man strive to be better? To survive. Why survive? To evolve. Why evolve? Vice versa. So why survive? 'Cos we all die. Why die? To create/for rebirth/cycle of life/etc. Why death and rebirth? Why not eternity? What's with this "chicken and egg" system that doesn't seem to have a (definite) beginning?